Can Digital Health Technologies Improve Health Literacy?

A recent article in the AMA News cites a 2003 health literacy study by the US Department of Education which surveyed more than 19,000 Americans. It found that over one-third had trouble reading and understanding basic medical information. Not surprisingly, people with low health literacy have worse medical outcomes, make more medication errors, have lower adherence to regimens, and are 50% more likely to be hospitalized (National Patient Safety Council). The worst part is that 75% of health illiterate patients will not tell their physicians about it. The biggest issues I see with health literacy are that patients are intimidated to discuss their low health literacy with the provider and to challenge care recommendations (which is not usually in a shared decision context), physicians do not speak in lay terms, and do not have enough time for ample, free-flowing discussions. In addition, low health literacy is not appreciated by providers and therefore the problem is a self-fulfilling one.
Among the tips in the article to improve health literacy are recommendations to have people, not machines make appointments, have patients make a list of medications, and prepare and write questions for the provider in advance of an appointment. I found it interesting and embarrassing that there was no mention of technologies in recommendations put forward by the authors.
Technology can improve health literacy. Information may be transmitted either in auditory or written mode, and educational materials about disease management, medications, instructions for caregivers, and appointments may be presented in native languages, with illustrations. The patient portal then becomes the common communication tool, which may contain prescribable links from the provider for the patient to view. Patients without PCs at home may watch in the provider’s office, log in at the library, or a smart phone. This type of technology has an ROI that’s hard to demonstrate on a commercial level, but clearly evident on a medical and ultimately gross economic one. Let’s use common sense, get with the 21st century, and improve the patient relationship literacy of our medical students, physicians, and other providers.
When we discuss wireless health technologies we often think about fancy tool which collect data from our bodies, even show us our DNA. But if health literacy is not improved, the messages which other mHealth technologies deliver will never have their impact. You may view the AMA article at: (http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2012/03/19/prsa0319.htm ).

About davidleescher

David Lee Scher, MD is Director at DLS HEALTHCARE CONSULTING, LLC, uniquely concentrating in mobile health technology clinical research design and implementation. A former cardiac electrophysiologist, well-respected clinical trial primary investigator, human subject research committee (IRB) chairman, Medicare advisory committee member, Dr. Scher was also a medical device industry key opinion leader for 20 years. He is Board Certified in Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular diseases, and Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology. A pioneer adopter of remote cardiac monitoring, he lectures worldwide promoting the benefits of mHealth technologies.
This entry was posted in digital health, education, healthcare economics, medical education, mHealth, psychology, technology, telehealth, wireless health and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Can Digital Health Technologies Improve Health Literacy?

  1. Pingback: mHealth meets p(ublic)Health « mHealth Strategy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s