Five Reasons Why Self-Insured Companies Need Mobile Health


According to 2011 research by the Employee Benefit Research Institute,  workers for companies with self-insured health plans make up 58.5% of workers with health coverage compared to 40.9% in 1998. The increase has been consistent over time. This percentage varied by state, from 30.5% (Hawaii) to 73.8% (Minnesota).  This number was 10.8% for companies with ten or fewer employees to 86.3% of companies with 1000 or greater employees.  It is very interesting to note that in Massachusetts, a theoretical model for predicting the full effects of the ACA, the percentage of self-insured company workers has risen dramatically in small (50-99 workers) companies from 54.4% in 2006 to 67.2% in 2011 and in large (1000 or more) companies from 74.1 to 86.4%. Therefore, it is likely that the percentage of self-insured company workers will rise even more in the coming few years ahead. Regardless of the size of the company, the cost of healthcare is critical to the bottom line.  In a previous post, I discussed why payers are critical to mHealth adoption.  However, mHealth is critical to payers as well. And as seen above, self-insured payers are a big piece of the puzzle. I’d like to discuss reasons why mHealth is good for self-insured companies.

1.    mHealth tools encouraged by a company show the worker is valued.  The potential benefits of mHealth tools in the form of apps and portals remains to be demonstrated in this setting.  However, the offering of tools which promote health, fitness, and self-management conveys a tie stronger than just an employer-employee relationship.  It is for this reason that health insurance companies have embraced patient portals and health coaches.

2.    mHealth tool utilization in employee health plans sets examples for customers and clients.  Demonstrating the company’s progressive (in the non-political sense) approach to healthcare might make for good marketing to clients and customers, whether they be other companies or individual consumers. One imaginative approach would be for the company to offer some of these tools to its clients or customers.

3.    mHealth tools will result in more productivity. According to the Met Life Caregiving Cost Study (often quoted today though it dates to 2006), the total estimated cost to employers for all full-time, employed caregivers is $33.6 billion annually and the average cost per employee/caregiver annually is $2110.  If these employees had apps which allowed them to communicate with healthcare providers, allowed them to get test results of the patient, afforded them the opportunity for a short video smartphone or other telehealth consultation at the place of work, or for them to receive actionable alert alarms from sensors their loved ones wear, the price of lost productivity could plummet dramatically. In addition, employees themselves would benefit physically from mHealth tools which improve their own lifestyles thereby decreasing the impact of or even potentially preventing chronic diseases.

4.    mHealth tools can integrate with other mobile platforms.  If a company already has mobile tools for work itself, integrating mHealth apps is not a big leap.  It will fit in with work flows or at least the adoption of mobile tools for other purposes. What about a reminder timed to pop up at break time to take a walk instead of chatting at the cooler, or to take the stairs prompted by a meeting reminder?

5.     mHealth apps will create happier employees. Healthier employees are happier. Employees are happier if their family members are benefitting from the tools. Some of these tools have associated social communities and employees can increase bonding if they take part in them. Utilization of these types of tools or creating employee health social groups based on them might improve employee satisfaction and teamwork.  

While the adoption of mHealth technologies has obvious potential benefits to all, the self-insured company offers unique challenges which are great opportunities  for worthwhile products. The workplace also affords an interesting research environment for mHealth apps.  They can be evaluated from many outcomes perspectives. Health coaches employed by traditional insurance companies are too costly for smaller self-insured companies. Apps offer convenience and more options.  Different sectors will require apps more specific to workers with unique health challenges based on occupation. The marketplace is there. I challenge companies with quality solutions to step up to the plate.

About these ads

About davidleescher

David Lee Scher, MD is Director at DLS HEALTHCARE CONSULTING, LLC, which specializes in helping digital health technology companies, their partners and clients. As a former cardiac electrophysiologist and pioneer adopter of remote patient monitoring, he is uniquely qualified to address both clinical and operational concerns of clients. Scher was Chair of Happtique's Blue Ribbon Panel which established standards for certification of medical apps in the categories of safety, operability, privacy, and content. He is a well-respected expert in mobile and other digital health technologies and lectures worldwide on technology and its impact on patients and healthcare systems.
This entry was posted in digital health, fitness, health insurance, healthcare economics, healthcare reform, medical apps, medical devices, mHealth, smartphone apps, technology, wireless health and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Five Reasons Why Self-Insured Companies Need Mobile Health

  1. Susan Perry says:

    I think the idea of integrating mhealth tools with other mobile platforms is a great idea. Many companies are using “wellness plans” to offer gym memberships and educate their employees. This seems like a great next step. And I agree that the workplace where we spend so much of our lives would afford very interesting research possibilities. Great blog again David. Real food for thought. Thank you.

    • Thanks for your comments, Susan. I agree that connectivity is going to be key in maximizing the benefits of mobile health tools as well as all of healthcare IT. We have a long way to go in many respects.

  2. Great list. Glad to you included value propositions from the employee (end user) perspective. At the end of day, no matter how much self-insured companies need mhealth solutions, they won’t be adopted without employees understanding/experiencing a clear personal benefit. Capitalizing on the value that mhealth solutions offer will require that self-insured companies really understand their employees in order create win-win’ scenarios that are sustainable in the workplace.

  3. Pingback: How Government Mandates Spur Development of Digital Health Technologies | The Digital Health Corner

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s